Smoking history as a predictive factor of treatment response in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review.

Recent trials in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) suggest that nonsmokers may benefit more from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy than will smokers. The aim of this systematic review was to assess smoking history as a predictive factor for treatment outcomes in patients with NSCLC. Relevant published literature was identified through systematic searches of databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library), oncology and thoracic journals, and abstracts from major oncology conferences using prespecified criteria. Articles reporting treatment outcomes (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS], and/or response rate) in smoking history subgroups from randomized controlled trials of targeted therapy and/or chemotherapy were reviewed. Data from 30 trials (32 articles, 4 abstracts) were included. Of these, 23 trials tested first-line therapy. Treatment arms included EGFR TKIs (13 trials), EGFR monoclonal antibodies (2 trials), non-EGFR targeted treatments (9 trials), chemotherapy (27 trials), and placebo or best supportive care only (3 trials). Smoking history definitions and analyses of its effect on treatment outcomes varied widely. Only 11 trials reported testing for a treatment-by-smoking history interaction. The available evidence supports but does not confirm smoking history as a predictive factor for the response to TKIs, particularly in previously treated patients. The evidence does not support smoking history as a predictor of response to non-EGFR-targeted therapies or chemotherapy. Smoking history and its effect on treatment response are inadequately reported. More rigorous collection, analysis, and reporting may clarify whether smoking history is a predictor of treatment response in advanced NSCLC.

A randomized phase 3 trial comparing pemetrexed/carboplatin and docetaxel/carboplatin as first-line treatment for advanced, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared survival without toxicity in patients with advanced, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer who were treated with first-line pemetrexed/carboplatin or docetaxel/carboplatin. METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3 trial comprised patients randomized (1:1) to pemetrexed/carboplatin (n = 128) or docetaxel/carboplatin (n = 132). Patients received treatment on day 1 of each 21-day cycle (maximum of six cycles). Treatment included carboplatin (area under the curve = 5 mg/ml × min) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) or docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)). The primary outcome measure, survival without treatment-emergent grade 3/4 toxicity, was defined as the time from randomization to the first treatment-emergent grade 3/4 adverse event or death and was analyzed using a log-rank test. The analysis population included 106 patients in the pemetrexed/carboplatin (Pem/Carb) group and 105 patients in the docetaxel/carboplatin (Doc/Carb) group. RESULTS: Survival without treatment-emergent grade 3/4 toxicity was significantly longer in the Pem/Carb versus the Doc/Carb group (log-rank p < 0.001; median survival without treatment-emergent grade 3/4 toxicity: 3.2 versus 0.7 months; adjusted hazard ratio = 0.45 [95% confidence interval: 0.34-0.61]). Overall survival was similar in the Pem/Carb versus the Doc/Carb group (log-rank p = 0.934; median survival: 14.9 versus 14.7 months; adjusted hazard ratio = 0.93 [95% confidence interval: 0.66-1.32]). Compared with the Doc/Carb group, fewer patients in the Pem/Carb group experienced grade 3/4 drug-related, treatment-emergent neutropenia, leukopenia, or febrile neutropenia, and more patients experienced anemia and thrombocytopenia. There were three study drug-related deaths during treatment in each group. CONCLUSIONS: The favorable benefit-to-risk profile of pemetrexed/carboplatin suggests that pemetrexed/carboplatin is an appropriate first-line treatment option for chemonaïve patients with advanced, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Histology as a treatment effect modifier in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the evidence.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review of prospective, randomized, controlled trials (RCT) to examine whether histology had a treatment modifying effect (TME) on the efficacy outcomes of chemotherapeutic agents in patients with advanced (stage IIIB-IV) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Potentially pertinent publications were reviewed in full to determine if there was any TME by histology for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) or treatment response rate (TRR). RESULTS: Data from three pemetrexed RCT, comparing (i) pemetrexed versus docetaxel, (ii) pemetrexed and cisplatin versus gemcitabine and cisplatin, and (iii) pemetrexed versus placebo, showed a statistically significant TME by histology for OS and PFS. One trial comparing pemetrexed and carboplatin versus gemcitabine and carboplatin found no significant associations between histology and OS. The results of this systematic review indicate that pemetrexed appears to have the most consistent treatment-by-histology interaction effect on the efficacy outcomes of chemotherapeutic agents in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients with non-squamous histology gain the greatest benefit from treatment with pemetrexed. Conversely, patients with squamous cell disease appeared to experience poorer OS when pemetrexed was compared with other active treatments, and similar OS when compared with placebo. Reproducible patterns of TME effect by histology with other chemotherapeutic agents are less clear. CONCLUSIONS: We consider that the historical approach to treating all NSCLC patients with the same chemotherapy regimen is now no longer acceptable.

A systematic review of the interobserver variability for histology in the differentiation between squamous and nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The importance of identifying non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) histologic subtype has increased recently because of the development of target-specific chemotherapeutic agents. This systematic review was undertaken to examine the interobserver variability for histology in differentiating between subtypes of NSCLC, specifically the ability to differentiate squamous from nonsquamous histology. METHODS: A systematic literature search was undertaken to identify studies that evaluated the reproducibility of histologic diagnosis by pathologists in their reporting of NSCLC subtypes. Studies were screened using a priori defined eligibility criteria. The National Health and Medical Research Council diagnostic levels of evidence were applied and quality assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Data were extracted and reanalyzed to permit comparison of agreement in nonsquamous and squamous cell carcinoma by 2 × 2 tables. Percentage agreement and kappa statistics were calculated for each included study. RESULTS: Out of 1480 articles identified through the literature search, six were eligible for inclusion. The percentage agreement for all subtypes of NSCLC in the included studies ranged from 67.1 to 89.6% (κ, 0.42-0.84). Based on the primary reanalysis of data (reanalysis 1), agreement between pathologists in differentiating nonsquamous and squamous histology ranged from 77.0 to 94.2% (κ = 0.48-0.88) indicating a moderate to high level of agreement. CONCLUSION: The reasonably high agreement and kappa statistics for the included studies suggest that pathologists can reproducibly differentiate between nonsquamous and squamous NSCLC. This is clinically important in guiding oncologist decision making in choosing the most appropriate therapy for their patients.

Gemcitabine administered as a short infusion versus a fixed dose rate in combination with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Previous studies have indicated that, in combination with cisplatin, fixed dose rate gemcitabine may be more efficacious than standard infusion gemcitabine. This open-label, randomised phase II study was aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these regimens as treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Latin American patients. Sixty-four patients were randomised to receive up to six cycles of treatment with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on Day 1 plus either gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) over 30 min on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle (standard arm, N=33) or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) at a fixed dose rate of 10 mg/m(2)/min on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle (FDR arm, N=31). In the standard arm, 9 of 33 (27%) patients responded compared with 6 of 30 (20%) patients in the FDR arm (odds ratio: 0.67, 95% CI, 0.21-2.2; p=0.56). Median overall survival was 7.5 months in the standard arm and 9.9 months in the FDR arm. One-year survival rates were 35% and 37% in the standard arm and the FDR arm, respectively. Patients in the FDR arm experienced more grade 3/4 haematological toxicity than those in the standard arm (48% versus 21%). The results of this trial do not support FDR administration of gemcitabine in preference to the standard administration in Latin American patients with NSCLC.

Influence of apoptosis and cell cycle regulator proteins on chemotherapy response and survival in stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC patients.

BACKGROUND: Prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is very poor. Prediction of the response to treatment in individual patients may be possible using molecular biological alterations such as clinical biomarkers. We investigated the predictive value of apoptosis and cell cycle regulator proteins for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC patients. METHODS: We evaluated p53, bcl-2, p21WAF1/CIP1, p27Kip1, and Ki67 immunohistochemical expression and apoptotic index in mediastinal lymph node metastases from 23 IIIA and 10 IIIB NSCLC patients before treatment with neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Univariate analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between protein expression and survival or time to progression (TTP). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 25 months (range, 4-112), median TTP was 11 months (range, 0-112), and median overall survival was 22 months (range, 4-112). Of 32 assessable patients, 18 (56%) had stable disease, 12 (38%) had a PR, and two (6%) had progressive disease. Of the 22 patients assessable for pN2 following chemotherapy, 16 (77%) were positive. Univariate analysis showed that shorter TTP correlated with progressive disease (p = 0.000), positive pN2 after chemotherapy (p = 0.026), high Ki67 (p = 0.022), and high p21WAF1/CIP1 (p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that in IIIA/IIIB NSCLC patients, a high level of p21WAF1 expression in mediastinal lymph node metastases before neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy is associated with a poor outcome. Our results suggest that expression of p21WAF1, which plays a role in preventing apoptosis, may be significant when selecting chemotherapy for NSCLC patients.

Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial to determine whether the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib prolongs survival in non-small-cell lung cancer after the failure of first-line or second-line chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer, with performance status from 0 to 3, were eligible if they had received one or two prior chemotherapy regimens. The patients were stratified according to center, performance status, response to prior chemotherapy, number of prior regimens, and prior platinum-based therapy and were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral erlotinib, at a dose of 150 mg daily, or placebo. RESULTS: The median age of the 731 patients who underwent randomization was 61.4 years; 49 percent had received two prior chemotherapy regimens, and 93 percent had received platinum-based chemotherapy. The response rate was 8.9 percent in the erlotinib group and less than 1 percent in the placebo group (P<0.001); the median duration of the response was 7.9 months and 3.7 months, respectively. Progression-free survival was 2.2 months and 1.8 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.61, adjusted for stratification categories; P<0.001). Overall survival was 6.7 months and 4.7 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.70; P<0.001), in favor of erlotinib. Five percent of patients discontinued erlotinib because of toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS: Erlotinib can prolong survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer after first-line or second-line chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin in stage IIIA/B non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: We studied cisplatin plus gemcitabine as induction (neoadjuvant) therapy in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to assess its objective remission rate, resectability, survival, and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage III NSCLC received 2 cycles of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15, plus cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 2. Subsequently, patients were assigned to local therapy--surgery or radiotherapy. RESULTS: Twenty-nine eligible patients (male/female: 21/8) with a median age of 59 years (range, 43-71 years) were enrolled between October 1996 and February 1999. A total of 80 cycles were given, with a median of 3 per patient (range, 1-4 cycles). Overall, toxicities were mild; only one patient had febrile neutropenia, and there were no grade 4 non-hematological toxicities. There was one toxic death following afebrile grade 4 neutropenia. Overall clinical response rate (2 complete responses [CRs] + 16 partial responses [PRs]) was 62% (95% CI, 45%-79%); 10 patients had stable disease and none progressed; one patient was not evaluable. Eight of the 18 operated patients had pathological response: 1 CR and 7 downstagings to N(-); 14 patients were resected. Median survival was 17 months (95% CI, 13-21 months), with 1-year and 2-year actuarial survival rates of 61% and 29%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin is a very active and well-tolerated induction regimen in stage III NSCLC. Comparative studies with other standard regimens are warranted.